Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 44(4): 740-749, July-Aug. 2018. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-954072

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Introduction: eGFR-categories are used to predict functional outcome after partial nephrectomy (PN); no study categorized patients according to preoperative renal scan (RS) data. Aim of the study was to evaluate if stratification of patients according to RS is a reliable method to predict minor/major loss of renal function after PN. Materials and Methods: We considered patients who underwent PN and RS pre-/post-PN for T1 tumor in our Institution (2007-2017). Demographics, perioperative and specifically functional data were analysed. On the basis of the baseline Split Renal Function (SRF), patients were stratified into risk-categories: 1) baseline operated-kidney SRF range 45-55%; 2) baseline operated-kidney SRF <45%. Risk categories were analysed with postoperative functional outcome: postoperative operated-kidney SRF decrease below 90% of baseline was considered significant loss of function. Contingency tables and univariate/multivariate regression were analysed looking for independent factors of postoperative functional impairment. Results: 224 patients were analysed, 125 (55.8%) maintained >90% of their baseline function. Worse probability of maintaining ≥90 baseline renal function was found in patients with Charlson's Comorbidity Index (CCI≥3) (p=0.004) and patients with PADUA score ≥8 (p=0.023). After stratification by baseline renal function, ischemia was the only independent factor: no effect on patients with poorer baseline renal function. Patients with baseline SRF 45-55% who did not experience ischemia had the highest probability to maintain ≥90% baseline SRF (p=0.028). Ischemia >25 minutes was detrimental (p=0.017). Conclusions: Stratification of patients by SRF before PN is not a reliable predictor of renal functional outcome. Ischemia seems to scarcely influence patients with poorer renal function.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/surgery , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/physiopathology , Risk Assessment/methods , Kidney/physiopathology , Kidney Neoplasms/surgery , Kidney Neoplasms/physiopathology , Nephrectomy/methods , Postoperative Period , Reference Values , Time Factors , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Logistic Models , Predictive Value of Tests , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Statistics, Nonparametric , Creatinine/blood , Warm Ischemia/methods , Preoperative Period , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Kidney/surgery , Kidney/blood supply , Kidney/pathology , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Middle Aged , Nephrectomy/adverse effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL